An Update Regarding the Coronavirus August 12, 2021 from Dr. Dubravec
An Update Regarding the Coronavirus
Dr. Martin Dubravec
August 12, 2021
This information is being provided on a periodic basis for patients and others interested in updates regarding the Coronavirus (COVID-19, Sars-CoV-2). Facts are provided. My comments and opinions are listed separately. The goals of these updates have been to help the community in keeping informed of issues regarding Coronavirus from a local medical perspective. As a clinical immunologist, I believe it is vital that information be shared with regard to this important issue. If you would like to receive this information via Email, feel free to Email us at aasc1234@protonmail.com . Readers are encouraged to seek as much information as possible regarding COVID-19. Your patience with any unintentional typos in these updates is appreciated!
Fact:
We have seen an uptick in patients calling with clinical COVID-19 (that is, symptoms of COVID-19 with or without a positive COVID-19 PCR test). Daily positive COVID-19 PCR tests are increasing slightly in Michigan but are nowhere near the peak seen in April 2021.
Comment/Opinion:
We can expect cases of COVID-19 to increase over the next week. If this increase is similar to other increases, we can expect COVID-19 cases to decrease by the end of August. It is interesting that there seems to be an increase just in time for the new school year. Also, this virus does not seem to be a wintertime virus like other Coronaviruses that have been circulating in the American population for decades. However, as we move forward, it is a reasonable prediction that this virus will become just another seasonal cold virus as it becomes less lethal.
The increase in cases is thought secondary to a new strain of COVID-19 called delta variant COVID-19. However, it is hard to tell as there are very few tests being performed on this virus to see if it is a variant. Also, some experts in the field of virology are very skeptical about the testing that is being done with regard to its accuracy.
Like most viruses, COVID-19 is less lethal, but possibly more contagious, over time. The influenza pandemic in the early 1900’s had multiple waves of cases in the United States over an 18 month period until it went through the population. It is reasonable to expect periodic increases in cases. This office will continue to monitor the data regarding this virus.
Fact:
The effectiveness of the experimental mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations has been called in to question. Recent data from the United States and Great Britain have revealed that the vaccines may not provide significant protection or no protection at all. Recent information by the CDC has shown that viral loads of infected patients are the same regardless of whether or not they have been vaccinated.
Dr. Kobi Haviv, medical director of Israel’s leading hospital for respiratory care, announced the following in an interview:
“85-90% of hospitalizations here are in fully vaccinated people.”
“the effectiveness of the vaccine is rapidly fading”
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/
Comment/Opinion:
Why is there data showing that the experimental COVID-19 gene therapy vaccinations are not effective? There are a few reasons:
These vaccines are causing the human body to become spike protein factories. The theory is that as the body produces these spike proteins, our immune systems will develop a response to these proteins and attack spike proteins on a COVID-19 virus should we be infected with the virus. However, the spike protein of the Coronavirus is prone to mutations. If the spike protein mutates, it will change its molecular shape and the immune system will no longer recognize it if it relies on the vaccine which only produces one form of spike protein. New variants of COVID-19 with mutated spike proteins are “invisible” to the immune system.
Another reason for the lack of effectiveness of these experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations is that the spike protein is a very small portion of the whole virus. If you immunize to just the spike protein, that may not be enough of an immune response to kill off an entire virus.
Yet another reason for the failure seen with experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations is that this new vaccine technology is just not working the way it is developed to work in a lab or a computer program. The human body is much more sophisticated than even the brightest researcher may envision. Unfortunately, due to the lack of animal studies to look at and study this technology fully, human beings are the experiments for this new technology. Never in human history has such a large undertaking been tried.
Fact:
The number of deaths associated with the experimental mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations is confusing from CDC data. When entering data points, the total number of deaths associated with the experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccination that are reported on VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) is 12,370. According to a Harvard study on the accuracy of VAERS, the number reported on VAERS represents only 1-10% of the total number of deaths associated with the experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations. (The Harvard study can be accessed at numerous websites including the following:
Therefore, the total number of deaths associated with the experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations is 123,700 to 1, 237,000 deaths.
Sources:
https://www.openvaers.com/
https://wonder.cdc.gov/
Comment/Opinion:
The total number of deaths associated with the experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations continues to rise. This urgently needs to be investigated. Getting the exact data from the VAERS system is confusing. An organization called OpenVAERS is looking at this data daily and their numbers are consistent with those listed above. This data reveals the notion that the experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccines are not safe.
Fact:
As another example of governments dealing with COVID-19, an Australian health official has advised people not to talk to each other and that masks may not protect people from COVID-19. She stated the following:
“Whilst it is in human nature to engage in conversation with others, to be friendly, unfortunately this is not the time to do that. So even if you run into your next door neighbor in the shopping center, in the grocery shop… don’t start up a conversation. Now is the time for minimizing your interactions with others even if you’ve got a mask – do not think that affords total protection.”
Source: https://twitter.com/
Comment/Opinion:
None.
Fact:
Many people are objecting to the experimental mRNA gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations based on religious grounds in addition to scientific reasons. Religious exemptions, in addition to medical exemptions, are being accepted in all locations based on observations thus far.
Source: Personhood Alliance offers religious exemption form for COVID vaccines
|
Comment/Opinion:
The use of fetal tissue in the development and/or testing of these vaccines is unnecessary and ethically indefensible. An exemption form has been sent to me. It may be a very useful template for those who object to vaccination with the experimental gene therapy COVID-19 vaccinations and is included in the next two pages of this update. It is a good example of why people have chosen not to receive these vaccinations based on religious beliefs.
Religious, Moral, and Ethical Exemption from COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements
The right to refuse medical treatment
My individual right of bodily integrity and my right to refuse medical treatments—particularly, but not exclusively, experimental ones—for religious, moral, ethical, and medical reasons, is protected by federal law and regulatory policy. In most cases, my rights are also protected in state law.
The FDA’s guidance on emergency use authorization (EUA) of medical products requires the FDA to “ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances...that they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product....” With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act [Title 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III)] reiterates that individuals be informed of “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.” Moreover, the National Research Act of 1974 requires protection for human subjects from harm, undue injustice, and coercion, which necessitates fully informed consent for unapproved, experimental treatments. EUA products are unapproved, unlicensed, and experimental. Under the Nuremberg Code—the foundation of modern ethical medicine—no one can be forced or coerced to participate in a medical experiment.
In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has previously stated that institutions which mandate vaccines are subject to reporting requirements and legal liability for adverse events. These federal statutory laws pose potential financial and legal penalties if institutions unduly pressure employees and/or students to accept what are classified as experimental medicines.
In summary, forced or coerced vaccination is a violation of my bodily integrity and therefore, is unethical and intrusive. Forced or coerced vaccination can also make institutions legally liable for damages that result from adverse events, including injury, permanent disability, and death.
The duty to refuse an illicitly derived treatment
As a Christian, I believe it is immoral for any institution to base, in whole or in part, an individual’s access to employment and/or education on receiving a medication derived from an abortion. The design, production, or testing of vaccines using the remains of aborted human beings, who did not consent to be experimented on and whose body parts were trafficked to provide the means for vaccine creation, is morally unacceptable. All of the COVID-19 vaccine products currently available in the U.S. under the FDA’s EUA were produced using aborted fetal cell lines, tested using aborted fetal cell lines, or both.
As a Christian, I oppose the trafficking and commodification of human beings at all stages of life, born and pre-born. I cannot, in good conscience, participate or accept practices that perpetuate and encourage the relationship between abortion, biomedical science, and human trafficking, no matter when that connection was initiated or how long a practice has been socially accepted.
Humans are made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:26). Christians have a duty to honor and care for the body God has given us as a temple of the Holy Spirit (Romans 12:1, 1 Corinthians 3:16, 1 Corinthians 6:20, 1 Corinthians 10:31). Therefore, to force or coerce a person to administer a substance into their body against their will is a violation of their personhood. Forced or coerced vaccination is also a violation of the dignity of the human person, because freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are fundamental to human dignity.
Moreover, decisions regarding vaccination must be determined by the individual and the family, not by the jurisdiction of the State or any other authority, according to biblical mandate (Romans 13:1). I have a right to uphold my own bodily integrity and moral conscience and a right to refuse medical treatment.
All humans also have a right not to be trafficked, commodified, and/or experimented on without their consent—born and pre-born—and to refuse to participate in acts that permit these violations to continue. As such, I am requesting a religious, moral, and ethical exemption from this institution’s COVID-19 vaccine policy based on my sincerely held personal religious, moral, and ethical beliefs.
______________________________
Name
______________________________
Date
Comments
Post a Comment